Skip Navigation Links
Quick Links
Minutes of GBM
About ANMPIExpand About ANMPI
Educational ActivitiesExpand Educational Activities
Student CornerExpand Student Corner
 
 
MUGA Protocols

 2. MUGA Protocols  Posted on
 10-01-2005


MUGA (Multigated) study is a procedure in which patients RBCs are radiolabeled, ECG gated and then ECG gated scintigraphy is obtained. Single or multiple studies of the left or right ventricle are done. Alternative names for the study are RNV (Radio Nuclide Ventriculography) and RNA (Radio Nuclide Angiography). 

Procedure:

1.     Patient preparation:

REST:

EXERCISE:
Patient should be fasting at least for 2-4 hours and hemodynamically & clinically stable. Exercise in the form of supine or upright ergometry is generally preferred. Patients who cannot exercise can undergo a pharmacological stress test with dobutamine. Any medication that may interfere pharmacological stress test should be stopped in consultation with treating physician for 24-48 hours prior to the test.   All emergency resuscitation measures should be available when conducting such a test. A trained physician for any resuscitation must be available in case of emergency. 

PRECAUTIONS:

RADIOPHARMACUETICALS:

IMAGE ACQUISITION:

A. Instrumentation :

1.     Acquisition parameters. 

FOR STRESS STUDY:

SOURCES OF ERROR WHILE DOING MUGA STUDY.

1. RBC labeling: Certain medications and illnesses like renal failure can cause poor RBC labeling and hence reduced target to background ratio. 

Patient positioning: The ejection fraction may be inadequately calculated if the best septal view is not possible.  [i.e. inability to separate left ventricle from other cardiac structures.]

2. Gating errors: Poor ECG signal or complexes in which other than the QRS complexes are dominant will result in spurious gating and data will not be interpretable. Care should be taken to ensure that proper QRS complex is the true gating /triggering signal.  Some times you may have to change the leads in the ECG gating device so as to select the proper QRS complexes.  

3. Heart rate variability: Significant variations in the heart rate during the study will compromise estimations of diastolic filling indices.  

4. Image statistics:  Inadequate count density usually less than 3 million counts may result in poor images and compromise image interpretations  

5. Processing errors:  Inclusion of non-ventricular activity or exclusion of ventricular activity from ventricular ROI may result in under or over estimation of the LVEF. Inclusion of left atrium in ROI will alter the LVEF. Inclusion of aorta or spleen in background ROI will alter the LVEF values.